MT-2 (Melanotan II)

The Pharmacology Works. This Compound Was Not Developed.

JMWritten & reviewed by Jack Muncaster · Founder, UK PeptidesLast reviewed 2026-08-234 cited sources

Three compounds derived from melanocortin pharmacology hold regulatory approvals in different indications: afamelanotide, setmelanotide and bremelanotide. MT-2 holds none anywhere, which reflects what was done with it rather than a limitation of the hormone family.

Key facts

Afamelanotide
Approved — erythropoietic protoporphyria
Setmelanotide
Approved — rare MC4R pathway obesity
Bremelanotide
Approved 2019 — HSDD
MT-2
No authorisation anywhere
Common origin
alpha-MSH pharmacology
What differs
Development, not chemistry

Three separate approvals, three separate indications

Afamelanotide for photoprotection in erythropoietic protoporphyria. Setmelanotide for obesity arising from defined MC4R pathway defects. Bremelanotide in a third indication entirely. Each required its own trials, its own safety database and its own regulatory assessment, and each obtained one.

What that establishes about the family

That melanocortin pharmacology is developable. There is no general barrier — no class-wide toxicity that stopped everything, no chemistry problem nobody could solve. Three compounds went through the process and came out with labels.

Research material referenced

MT-2 10mg — third-party HPLC tested

View — £19.99

Which makes MT-2's position specific rather than general

Its absence from that list is not evidence that melanocortin compounds cannot be approved. It reflects that this particular compound was never taken through development — no registered clinical programme, no assessed indication, no label, no contraindications, no pharmacovigilance.

The selectivity thread running through all three

Each approved compound has a receptor profile matched to what it is for. Setmelanotide targets MC4R, the receptor governing the pathway its indication concerns. That specificity is part of what made assessment possible, and a compound described as non-selective across four alpha-MSH-responsive receptors is a harder object to assess.

Why this framing is the honest one

It would be inaccurate to imply melanocortin compounds are inherently unapprovable, and equally inaccurate to imply MT-2 is approvable-in-waiting. The accurate statement is narrower: three related compounds were developed and approved, this one was not, and no evidence exists either way about what assessment would have concluded.

The position that follows

MT-2 holds no marketing authorisation from the MHRA, EMA, FDA or any other regulator, has no registered clinical programme, and carries a published dermatological harms literature described elsewhere in this category. It is supplied here for laboratory research only.

Quick reference

CompoundApprovedIndication
AfamelanotideYesErythropoietic protoporphyria
SetmelanotideYesRare MC4R pathway obesity
BremelanotideYes, 2019Hypoactive sexual desire disorder
MT-2NoNone — never assessed

Extended research context

The MT-2 (Melanotan II) deep dive

Deep dive: the identifier collision that points the wrong way

This site has now found several plausible-looking identifiers that resolve to the wrong molecule. A PubChem record for tirzepatide cited as retatrutide. Thymosin beta-4's CAS quoted as TB-500's. An unrelated organic acid returned for KPV. This one is the most consequential of the set, and the reason is direction. Searching PubChem for melanotan returns CID 16197727 - afamelanotide, at 1,646.8 Da for C78H111N21O19. That is Melanotan I, a linear thirteen-residue peptide, and it is an APPROVED MEDICINE, marketed as Scenesse for erythropoietic protoporphyria. Melanotan II is CID 92432: cyclic, seven residues, 1024.2 Da, 622 Da lighter, and assessed by no regulator anywhere. So the wrong record does not merely mislead about mass. It resolves from an unlicensed compound toward a licensed one, and the sequential naming - I and II - makes them look like versions of a single product rather than the structurally distinct compounds they are. Anyone verifying a certificate by searching the bare name lands on an approved drug's record and may never notice which compound it names.

Deep dive: four stability features in seven residues

PubChem's IUPAC name for CID 92432 is unusually complete and reads as a full specification: N-acetyl-L-norleucyl-L-alpha-aspartyl-L-histidyl-D-phenylalanyl-L-arginyl-L-tryptophyl-L-lysinamide, cyclic (2-7)-peptide. Unpack it and there are four independent protease-resistance features in a molecule of seven residues. A lactam bridge joins the aspartate side chain at position 2 to the lysine side chain at position 7, closing the ring - which both locks conformation for receptor engagement and eliminates the free termini exopeptidases require. Position 4 is D-phenylalanine, the mirror image of the natural form, and proteases are stereospecific enough that they largely cannot process it. The N-terminus is acetylated and the C-terminus amidated, capping both ends. And position 1 is norleucine, which is not among the twenty proteinogenic amino acids at all - so even setting aside the cyclisation and the D residue, this peptide could never have been a gene product. It is a fully synthetic construction rather than a modified natural sequence, and it is among the most chemically robust compounds in this catalogue as a direct result.

Deep dive: why the safety literature is included rather than omitted

There is a published dermatological literature here, and the editorial choice was to state it. Reid and colleagues documented atypical melanocytic naevi following melanotan injection in the Irish Medical Journal in 2013. Eijmael and colleagues published a risk review in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde in 2022 - a national medical journal considering the topic worth addressing directly. Case reports have a real limitation: they establish an observation without a denominator, so they cannot establish causation or incidence, which is the same constraint that applies to pharmacovigilance disproportionality signals. But that limitation cuts both ways. A case report is not proof of harm and it is not dismissible either. What makes the absence of better data significant here is that no regulator has assessed this compound - so there is no label, no contraindications, no adverse event reporting requirement and no monitoring framework. The information that would normally exist for an injectable product simply does not, and what is available instead is what individual clinicians chose to publish after seeing something. Presenting the compound without that context would give an incomplete picture of what is actually known.

Research applications

  • Melanocortin receptor pharmacology and selectivity research
  • Cyclic peptide and lactam bridge design studies
  • D-amino acid substitution and protease resistance research
  • Structure-activity work on constrained peptide analogues
  • Comparative work on alpha-MSH derivatives
  • Analytical method development for cyclic peptides

Handling checklist

  • Verify against CID 92432, 1024.2 Da, C50H69N15O9, CAS 121062-08-6
  • Never verify by searching 'melanotan' alone - that returns afamelanotide at 1,646.8 Da
  • Require stereochemistry on the certificate - D-Phe4 is not detectable by mass
  • Protect from light; tryptophan at position 6 is photochemically reactive
  • Store lyophilised, cold, dry and dark
  • Expect no disulfide or oxidation satellites - no cysteine, no methionine
  • Quantification at 280 nm is available thanks to the tryptophan

Common research-handling mistakes

Learnt from thousands of researcher orders across our UK labs.

Searching PubChem for 'melanotan' to verify identity

Fix: That returns CID 16197727, afamelanotide, at 1,646.8 Da - an approved medicine and a different molecule. Use CID 92432 or search Melanotan II with the numeral.

Treating Melanotan I and II as versions of one compound

Fix: They differ by 622 Da, by six residues, and by whether the peptide is cyclic or linear. Only Melanotan I has been assessed by regulators.

Reading afamelanotide's approval as covering MT-2

Fix: Different molecule, different structure, different evidence, different assessment. Nothing transfers.

Accepting a sequence written without stereochemistry

Fix: L- and D-phenylalanine have identical mass. A peptide with the L form at position 4 is a different compound that mass spectrometry cannot distinguish.

Assuming a non-selective agonist affects only its intended receptor

Fix: Five melanocortin receptors share binding surfaces across different tissues. Engagement elsewhere is the same pharmacology in another place, not a side reaction.

Continue researching

Peer-reviewed guides, comparators and matched reference materials.

Related questions researchers ask

  • Why does searching for melanotan return an approved medicine?
  • What is the difference between Melanotan I and Melanotan II?
  • How do four separate modifications make one small peptide protease-resistant?
  • What are the five melanocortin receptors and where are they?
  • How do MT-2 and KPV relate through their shared parent hormone?
  • What does the published dermatology literature actually report?

Frequently asked questions

Are melanocortin compounds approvable?
Yes. Three — afamelanotide, setmelanotide and bremelanotide — hold approvals in different indications.
Why isn't MT-2 among them?
It was never taken through development. There is no registered clinical programme, no assessed indication and no label.
Does that mean it would fail assessment?
No evidence exists either way. The accurate statement is that it was not assessed, not that it was assessed and rejected.

Primary sources & clinical trials

Peer-reviewed research and registered trials from PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubChem, FDA and NIH. All links open in a new tab and point to the primary source, so every claim can be verified at origin.

JM

Written and reviewed by

Jack Muncaster · Founder, UK Peptides

Jack founded UK Peptides in Manchester after repeatedly receiving research compounds with missing or recycled paperwork. He is responsible for supplier selection, batch release decisions and the content published in this research library. Every article here is sourced to primary literature and every product page to a signed third-party certificate.

More MT-2 (Melanotan II) articles

Popular across the research hub

One flagship guide from every other research category — keep exploring.

Research use only. The information above is provided for scientific and educational reference. Compounds referenced are not approved for human use and are supplied for in vitro research or reference-material purposes only. No efficacy, safety, or therapeutic claims are made.