Research & Regulatory News

VESPER: What Is Actually Registered for Berobenatide

JMWritten & reviewed by Jack Muncaster · Founder, UK PeptidesLast reviewed 2026-08-237 cited sources

VESPER is the clinical programme for berobenatide (PF-08653944, formerly MET-097i), Pfizer's ultra-long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist. Six trials carry the VESPER name in company communications, ranging from Phase 2b to Phase 3; the registry tells a slightly different story about which of those names are formally registered.

Key facts

Compound
Berobenatide (INN)
Development codes
PF-08653944, PF'3944, formerly MET-097 / MET-097i
Originator
Metsera, acquired by Pfizer 13 November 2025
Phase 2b trials
VESPER-1, VESPER-2, VESPER-3
Phase 3 trials registered
VESPER-4, VESPER-5, and NCT07595549
Largest registered trial
VESPER-4, 3,578 participants (estimated)
Latest primary completion
4 May 2028 (NCT07595549)
Stated programme size
10 Phase 3 studies planned in 2026

What the registry actually contains

Searching the registry by intervention returns a coherent programme, and it is worth setting out because company communications and registry records use different names for the same studies. VESPER-1 (NCT06712836) is a Phase 2 trial of 239 participants, completed, with primary completion 3 July 2025. VESPER-2 (NCT06897202) is Phase 2, 133 participants, completed, primary completion 29 December 2025. VESPER-3 (NCT06973720) is Phase 2, 268 participants, primary completion 16 December 2025, and is registered as a study of once-weekly switching to once-monthly dosing. VESPER-4 (NCT07311850) is Phase 3 with an estimated 3,578 participants and primary completion 21 September 2027.

The two Phase 3 trials whose acronyms are not registered

Two more Phase 3 records exist and neither carries a registered acronym, which is a small thing that causes real confusion. NCT07400653 has an official title ending '(VESPER-5)' - the name is present in the free-text title but the structured acronym field is empty, so the trial does not surface when you search the registry by that name. It is a Phase 3 trial of 1,044 participants in people with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes, with primary completion 12 October 2027. NCT07595549 is a Phase 3 trial of 954 participants that began recruiting on 10 June 2026 with primary completion 4 May 2028; press coverage calls it VESPER-6, and the registry record carries that name in neither the acronym field nor the title. If you are trying to verify a claim about 'VESPER-6', that is why you cannot find it.

Why the trial sizes tell you where the programme is

The step from Phase 2b to Phase 3 here is a factor of thirteen: 268 participants in VESPER-3, 3,578 in VESPER-4. That is not unusual for obesity, where the safety database has to be large enough to characterise uncommon events and regulators expect a substantial exposure population. It does mean the informative efficacy data available today comes from studies of a few hundred people, and the pivotal evidence does not exist yet. Primary completion for the first Phase 3 is September 2027.

What the programme is testing that others are not

The distinguishing design feature is the dosing schedule. VESPER-3's registered title describes weekly dosing switching to monthly: four regimens of twelve weekly doses of MET097, with or without titration, followed by multiple monthly doses, against a placebo arm on the same schedule. The primary endpoint is percent change in body weight at week 28. No approved GLP-1 receptor agonist is dosed monthly, so the question the programme exists to answer is whether the weight reduction achieved on a weekly schedule holds when the interval is stretched fourfold.

What has been reported so far

Pfizer reported VESPER-3 topline on 3 February 2026: placebo-adjusted weight loss at week 28 of up to 12.3% on the efficacy estimand with a 4.8 mg monthly dose, and 10.5% on the treatment-policy estimand for that arm. A separate arm reported 10% and 8.4% on the same pair of estimands. From VESPER-1's Part B extension, 15.9% non-placebo-adjusted mean weight loss at 32 weeks on the top weekly dose. From VESPER-2, HbA1c fell 2.2 percentage points on the 1.6 mg weekly dose against 0.2 on placebo. Every one of those numbers comes from a Phase 2b study of a few hundred people, and none of them is pivotal evidence.

What this means for anyone reading about it

Berobenatide is not licensed anywhere, for anything. It is an investigational compound in Phase 3 development with first approvals discussed for 2028 at the earliest. It is not supplied here in any form and there is no research material corresponding to it on this site. It is covered because the monthly-dosing question is the most interesting open engineering problem in the class, and because a reader trying to check a claim about it should be able to find the registry numbers in one place.

Quick reference

TrialRegistrationPhaseEnrolmentPrimary completion
VESPER-1NCT0671283622393 July 2025
VESPER-2NCT06897202213329 December 2025
VESPER-3NCT06973720226816 December 2025
VESPER-4NCT0731185033,578 (est.)21 September 2027
VESPER-5 (title only)NCT0740065331,044 (est.)12 October 2027
No registered acronymNCT075955493954 (est.)4 May 2028

Extended research context

The Research & Regulatory News deep dive

Deep dive: why 2026 was the year the incretin field split in two

For a decade every meaningful GLP-1 medicine was a peptide, and every one of them was injected. 2026 broke that pattern in both directions at once. In August the MHRA authorised orforglipron, a small molecule with no peptide bonds that works as an ordinary daily tablet. Three months earlier, retatrutide's TRIUMPH-1 reported a 28.3% mean weight reduction — the largest figure yet from a single molecule, and achievable only with a peptide capable of engaging three receptors at once. The field is not converging on one answer; it is separating into a convenience track and a magnitude track, and those tracks have different chemistry.

Deep dive: what a marketing authorisation actually means

An authorisation is granted to a specific product, in a specific formulation, for a specific indication, by a specific regulator. It is not a statement about a compound class and it does not transfer. Orforglipron being licensed in the UK tells you nothing about the legal or regulatory status of any other incretin, and nothing at all about compounds that remain investigational. Authorisation is also separate from funding: a licensed medicine is not automatically available on the NHS, which requires a further NICE appraisal.

Deep dive: reading trial results without being misled

Headline percentages are the least transferable part of a trial. A figure is only meaningful alongside its population, its duration, its comparator and its dropout rate. TRIUMPH-1's 28.3% came from an 80-week study in a relatively uncomplicated obesity population; TRIUMPH-3's 22.6% came from adults with severe obesity and established cardiovascular disease, and the gap between those two numbers is mostly population, not potency. Discontinuation rates deserve the same attention as efficacy: 11.3% of the TRIUMPH-1 12 mg arm stopped due to adverse events against 4.9% on placebo, and that figure is routinely dropped from summaries.

Research applications

  • Tracking regulatory status of investigational incretin compounds
  • Understanding the difference between authorisation, NICE appraisal and NHS availability
  • Comparing peptide and non-peptide receptor agonist pharmacology
  • Interpreting Phase 3 topline releases before peer-reviewed publication
  • Verifying trial identity against ClinicalTrials.gov registrations

Handling checklist

  • Check the compound named in a trial registration matches the compound being discussed
  • Confirm the NCT identifier resolves to the acronym being cited
  • Read topline press releases as preliminary until peer-reviewed publication
  • Separate the trial population from the headline percentage before comparing studies
  • Treat authorisation in one jurisdiction as saying nothing about status in another

Common research-handling mistakes

Learnt from thousands of researcher orders across our UK labs.

Treating a positive Phase 3 as approval

Fix: Filing begins a review that commonly takes a year or more and can end in a request for more data.

Comparing weight-reduction percentages across different trials

Fix: Population, duration and comparator differ; the numbers are not interchangeable.

Assuming one incretin's approval legitimises another compound

Fix: Authorisations are product-specific and do not transfer between compounds.

Citing a TRIUMPH number without checking the NCT identifier

Fix: Verify against ClinicalTrials.gov — the numbering has been widely misreported.

Reading research material as an alternative to a licensed medicine

Fix: Research material is supplied for laboratory use only and is not a substitute for anything prescribed.

Continue researching

Peer-reviewed guides, comparators and matched reference materials.

Related questions researchers ask

  • Is orforglipron a peptide?
  • Has retatrutide been approved by the MHRA?
  • What did TRIUMPH-1 actually report?
  • Why can orforglipron be taken as a tablet when peptides cannot?
  • Are research peptides legal in the UK?
  • What is the difference between MHRA authorisation and NHS availability?

Frequently asked questions

Is VESPER-6 a real trial?
A real trial exists - NCT07595549, Phase 3, 954 participants, recruiting since 10 June 2026. Whether it is 'VESPER-6' depends on your source: press coverage uses that name and the registry record does not, in either the acronym field or the official title. The trial is real; the name is a company designation that has not been entered into the registry.
Why does VESPER-5 not show up when I search for it?
Because registry search matches the structured acronym field, and NCT07400653's acronym field is empty even though its official title ends with '(VESPER-5)'. Searching the intervention name - berobenatide, PF-08653944 or MET097 - finds it. This is a recurring problem with sponsor acronyms and it is why any claim attached to an acronym should be traced back to an NCT number.
How does 3,578 participants compare with other obesity Phase 3 trials?
It is a normal size for a pivotal obesity programme. The number is set less by what is needed to detect a weight difference - which is easy, because the effect is large - than by the safety database regulators expect before approving a chronically dosed drug in a large population.
Is berobenatide available to buy?
No. It is investigational, not licensed in any jurisdiction, and not supplied on this site. Anything sold anywhere under that name would not be the compound in these trials.

Primary sources & clinical trials

Peer-reviewed research and registered trials from PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubChem, FDA and NIH. All links open in a new tab and point to the primary source, so every claim can be verified at origin.

JM

Written and reviewed by

Jack Muncaster · Founder, UK Peptides

Jack founded UK Peptides in Manchester after repeatedly receiving research compounds with missing or recycled paperwork. He is responsible for supplier selection, batch release decisions and the content published in this research library. Every article here is sourced to primary literature and every product page to a signed third-party certificate.

More Research & Regulatory News articles

Popular across the research hub

One flagship guide from every other research category — keep exploring.

Research use only. The information above is provided for scientific and educational reference. Compounds referenced are not approved for human use and are supplied for in vitro research or reference-material purposes only. No efficacy, safety, or therapeutic claims are made.