The short answer
Survodutide and mazdutide are GLP-1/glucagon dual agonists. Adding glucagon-receptor activity increases energy expenditure and mobilises hepatic fat, which is why both have been studied in metabolic liver disease alongside obesity. Mazdutide is approved in China; survodutide remains investigational with Phase 3 data reported.
Key facts
- Survodutide
- BI 456906 (Boehringer Ingelheim / Zealand Pharma)
- Mazdutide
- IBI362 (Innovent / Eli Lilly)
- Class
- GLP-1 / glucagon dual receptor agonists
- Mazdutide status
- Approved in China; not US or EU
- Mazdutide Phase 3
- ~20% reduction on 9 mg
- Additional target
- Hepatic fat / metabolic liver disease
Why adding glucagon seems backwards
Glucagon raises blood glucose, so deliberately activating its receptor in people with metabolic disease looks like the wrong direction. The resolution is that glucagon does more than mobilise glucose: it increases resting energy expenditure and drives hepatic lipid oxidation. When paired with sufficient GLP-1 agonism, the glucose-raising effect is offset while the energy-expenditure and liver-fat effects remain. The balance between the two activities is the central design problem.
Survodutide
Survodutide, developed by Boehringer Ingelheim with Zealand Pharma under the code BI 456906, is a GLP-1/glucagon dual agonist. Its Phase 2 programme reported reductions in liver fat that positioned it as a candidate in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis as well as obesity, and it has progressed into Phase 3 including a cardiovascular outcomes study and a Japanese programme registered as SYNCHRONIZE-JP.
Research material referenced
Retatrutide 10mg, third-party HPLC tested
Mazdutide
Mazdutide, developed by Innovent Biologics in collaboration with Eli Lilly under the code IBI362, is a GLP-1/glucagon dual agonist derived from oxyntomodulin. Phase 3 work in Chinese adults with obesity reported approximately 20% weight reduction on the 9 mg dose. It has been approved in China but holds no authorisation in the United States or European Union, and further trials continue across obstructive sleep apnoea and type 2 diabetes remission.
Where the glucagon arm may matter most
The distinguishing claim for this class is not weight reduction alone, since retatrutide and CagriSema report larger figures. It is the direct effect on hepatic fat. Metabolic liver disease is a large and poorly served indication, and a compound that addresses liver fat and body weight together has a different clinical case from one that addresses weight alone.
How this relates to retatrutide
Retatrutide contains glucagon-receptor agonism as one of its three activities, so it shares this mechanism rather than competing with it. The difference is that retatrutide adds GIP on top, making it a triple rather than dual agonist. Studying the duals in isolation is part of how the field works out how much each receptor contributes.
Frequently asked questions
- Does glucagon agonism raise blood sugar?
- On its own it would. In these compounds the GLP-1 component offsets it, and the balance between the two activities is a deliberate design parameter.
- Is mazdutide available outside China?
- No. It holds Chinese approval but no US or EU authorisation.
- What is oxyntomodulin?
- A naturally occurring gut peptide that activates both GLP-1 and glucagon receptors. It is the biological precedent this drug class is built on.
Extended research context
The GLP-1 & Incretin Science deep dive
Deep dive: the two routes to a bigger effect
Every compound trying to beat GLP-1 alone has taken one of two routes. The first adds more receptors from the same hormone family: GIP in tirzepatide, GIP and glucagon in retatrutide. The second adds a non-incretin satiety hormone, which in practice means amylin: CagriSema combines cagrilintide with semaglutide, and amycretin engages both receptors from one molecule. Both routes work, because they recruit signalling pathways that do not fully overlap. Neither has escaped the constraint that binds all of them, which is that gastrointestinal tolerability worsens as effect size grows.
Deep dive: why a percentage is not a result
The most-quoted numbers in this field are the least comparable. REDEFINE 1 reported 22.7% and 20.4% for the same compound in the same trial, the first among participants who adhered to treatment, the second across everyone randomised. TRIUMPH-1 reported 28.3% in an uncomplicated obesity population while TRIUMPH-3 reported up to 22.6% in adults with established cardiovascular disease, using the same compound. Before any two figures can be compared they have to match on estimand, population, duration, comparator and whether the number is placebo-adjusted. Most published comparisons match on none of them.
Deep dive: what happens after the trial stops
Every headline figure describes weight while treatment continues. The STEP-1 extension found that a year after semaglutide was stopped, participants had given back roughly two-thirds of what they lost, moving from 17.3% mean reduction to a net 5.6%, though average weight remained below baseline and nearly half stayed at least 5% down. Meta-analysis puts regain at around 0.8 kg per month. This is why maintenance studies such as TRIUMPH-6 matter more to the field's future than another two points of peak reduction.
Research applications
- ▸Comparing incretin and amylin compounds on a like-for-like basis
- ▸Interpreting estimands, thresholds and placebo-adjusted figures in trial reports
- ▸Tracking the obesity pipeline across sponsors and jurisdictions
- ▸Understanding receptor pharmacology behind GLP-1, GIP, glucagon and amylin
- ▸Distinguishing licensed medicines from investigational compounds
Handling checklist
- ✓Identify which estimand a quoted percentage comes from before citing it
- ✓Check the trial population and baseline BMI against the comparison you are making
- ✓Confirm the duration and whether the reduction curve had plateaued
- ✓Read discontinuation rates alongside efficacy figures
- ✓Verify every NCT identifier against ClinicalTrials.gov rather than secondary reporting
Common research-handling mistakes
Learnt from thousands of researcher orders across our UK labs.
✗ Comparing headline percentages across different trials
Fix: Population, duration, estimand and comparator all differ; the numbers are not interchangeable.
✗ Quoting the larger of two figures from the same trial
Fix: Name the estimand. Efficacy and treatment-policy answer different questions.
✗ Treating peak reduction as a durable outcome
Fix: Substantial regain follows cessation across the class; peak figures describe a maintained state.
✗ Assuming an oral route means a weaker mechanism
Fix: Route and receptor count are independent. Orforglipron is weaker because it hits one receptor, not because it is a tablet.
✗ Reading investigational compounds as available treatments
Fix: Most of this pipeline holds no authorisation anywhere; mazdutide is approved only in China.
Continue researching
Peer-reviewed guides, comparators and matched reference materials.
Related questions researchers ask
- Which weight-loss compound produces the largest reduction?
- What is the difference between CagriSema and amycretin?
- What is an amylin receptor agonist?
- How much weight is regained after stopping a GLP-1?
- Why does CagriSema report two different percentages?
- Why is orforglipron less effective than retatrutide?
Primary sources & clinical trials
Peer-reviewed research and registered trials from PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubChem, FDA and NIH. All links open in a new tab and point to the primary source, so every claim can be verified at origin.
- TrialClinicalTrials.gov: survodutide cardiovascular outcomes (NCT06077864)clinicaltrials.gov
- TrialClinicalTrials.gov: SYNCHRONIZE-JP (NCT06176365)clinicaltrials.gov
- TrialClinicalTrials.gov: mazdutide programmeclinicaltrials.gov
- RefBeyond GLP-1s: which weight-loss drugs are on the way. Medscapemedscape.com
- TrialClinicalTrials.gov · TRIUMPH-1 (NCT05929066). Retatrutide pivotal obesity trialclinicaltrials.gov
- TrialClinicalTrials.gov · TRIUMPH-6 (NCT06859268). Maintenance of weight reductionclinicaltrials.gov
- RefNovo Nordisk · CagriSema REDEFINE 1, published in NEJMprnewswire.com
- PubMedAmycretin phase 1b/2a subcutaneous study. PubMed (PMID 40550231)pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- RefTrajectory of weight regain after GLP-1 cessation. eClinicalMedicinethelancet.com
- PubMedOrforglipron: A Comprehensive Review. Int J Mol Sci 2026 (PMID 41683830)pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- EMAICH E9(R1): estimands in clinical trials (EMA)ema.europa.eu
- GuidelineGoogle: Creating helpful, reliable, people-first contentdevelopers.google.com
Written and reviewed by
The UK Peptides Editorial Team · Research library, UK Peptides
The editorial team is responsible for supplier selection, batch release decisions and the content published in this research library. Every article here is sourced to primary literature and every product page to a signed third-party certificate. Corrections are made in place and the review date updated.
More GLP-1 & Incretin Science articles
- What the Data Says About Weight Regain After StoppingSTEP-1 extension found about two-thirds of lost weight returned within a year of stopping semaglutide. Meta-analyses put regain at roughly 0.8 kg per month.
- How to Read a Weight-Loss Trial Result ProperlyEstimands, populations, durations and discontinuation rates. Why CagriSema reports both 22.7% and 20.4%, and why headline percentages are not comparable.
- Oral Semaglutide vs OrforglipronBoth are tablets, only one is a peptide. Why oral semaglutide needs SNAC and a fasting window while orforglipron needs neither, and what that costs each.
- What Is Aleniglipron? The Second Oral Small-Molecule GLP-1Aleniglipron is an oral non-peptide GLP-1 agonist from Structure Therapeutics. ACCESS reported 12.1% at 36 weeks; ACCESS II reported 15.3% absolute at 44 weeks.
- What Is Semaglutide? Structure, Mechanism and EvidenceSemaglutide is a GLP-1 analogue with 94% homology to native GLP-1. Its structure, the C18 diacid that gives it a weekly half-life, and the SELECT outcome data.
Popular across the research hub
One flagship guide from every other research category.
- Retatrutide ResearchIs Retatrutide Legal?
- GHK-Cu (Copper Peptide)What Is GHK-Cu? The Copper Complex Isolated in 1973
- TB-500 (Thymosin β4 fragment)TB-500 Benefits: What Is Established and What Is Not
- BPC-157 (Pentadecapeptide)BPC-157 Structure and Sequence
- CJC-1295 & IpamorelinSynergy: A Word Worth Using Carefully
- Peptide ReferenceAspartimide Formation and Why It Hides
- Bacteriostatic WaterWhat Is Bacteriostatic Water? Composition and Specification
- Research & Regulatory NewsThe Trial Where Glucose-Dependence Shows Up in Numbers
- MOTS-c (Mitochondrial Peptide)MOTS-c Mechanism: AMPK Activation via the Folate Cycle
- Semax (ACTH Fragment Peptide)What Are Glyprolines? The Pro-Gly-Pro Motif Explained
- Selank (Tuftsin Analogue)Selank and GABAergic Signalling
- DSIP (Delta Sleep-Inducing Peptide)What Delta Waves Are, and Why DSIP Is Named for Them
- KLOW (Blend)A Fourfold Size Range in One Vial
- GLOW (Blend)One Volume, Three Peptides
- MT-2 (Melanotan II)The Receptor That Decides Which Pigment Is Made
- IGF-1 LR3IGF-1 LR3 Against the Native Hormone
- GlutathioneHow Glutathione Is Built
- NAD+NAD+ Precursors: Nicotinamide Riboside and NMN
- KPVKPV Chemical Identity